1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (152 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | 1300 | Megane |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 152 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 60 L |