1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2003 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2003 Westfield ZEI is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield ZEI (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin 1300 weights approximately 188 kg more than 2003 Westfield ZEI.
Because 2003 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin 1300 | 2003 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | Austin | Westfield |
| Model | 1300 | ZEI |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2340 mm |
