1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1446 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 1300 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 132 L |