1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | 1300 | Eos |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 55 L |