1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2009 Opel Combo
To start off, 2009 Opel Combo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Opel Combo (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 2009 Opel Combo | |
Make | Austin | Opel |
Model | 1300 | Combo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 80.6 mm |
Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 52 L |