1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2010 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2010 Hyundai i20 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Hyundai i20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hyundai i20 (99 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai i20 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Hyundai i20 (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Hyundai i20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 2010 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Austin | Hyundai |
Model | 1300 | i20 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 17:01 |
Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 163 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2525 mm |