1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 50 L |