1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1970 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Calais is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 552 kg more than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin 3-Litre | 1970 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 3-Litre | Calais |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 2076 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3300 mm |
