1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 324 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1967 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 3-Litre | 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 3-Litre | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2560 mm |