1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 147 kg more than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (221 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 3-Litre | 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 3-Litre | Colorado |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 2769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1671 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |