1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 136 kg more than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (221 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 3-Litre | 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 3-Litre | Equinox |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |