1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 356 kg more than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (221 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 3-Litre | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 3-Litre | 300 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 529 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |