1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 881 kg more than 1967 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 1967 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Austin 3-Litre (221 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1967 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 3-Litre | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 3-Litre | Livina |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 52 L |