1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 188 kg more than 1967 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Austin 3-Litre (221 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1967 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin 3-Litre | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | 3-Litre | Condor |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 2986 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 99.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 22.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1712 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |
