1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin 3-Litre (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Austin 3-Litre (221 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 3-Litre | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Austin | Proton |
Model | 3-Litre | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2610 mm |