1967 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2012 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2012 Ford Kuga is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Kuga (197 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 2012 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin 3-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 3-Litre | 2012 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 3-Litre | Kuga |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 53 L |