1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1950 Fiat 1500
To start off, 1967 Austin A 40 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 1500 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Fiat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 47 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Fiat 1500 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 1950 Fiat 1500 | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 35 L |