1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1967 Austin A 40 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Fiat Campagnola (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 490 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 1952 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | Campagnola |
Year Released | 1967 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2260 mm |