1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1967 Austin A 40 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Maserati A6G weights approximately 290 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 40 | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | A 40 | A6G |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2560 mm |
