1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1961 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1967 Austin A 40 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,096 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin A 40 (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin A 40 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 40 | 1961 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Austin | DAF |
| Model | A 40 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1096 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2060 mm |
