1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1436 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 40 | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1096 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3390 mm |
