1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1980 Toyota Tercel is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Tercel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Tercel (70 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Tercel weights approximately 60 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Tercel |
Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2510 mm |