1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1984 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1984 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,499 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 790 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 40 | 1984 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1096 cc | 4499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2820 mm |
