1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1989 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1967 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4690 mm |