1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1994 Renault Ludo

To start off, 1994 Renault Ludo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Renault Ludo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Renault Ludo (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Renault Ludo weights approximately 255 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Renault Ludo (107 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 1994 Renault Ludo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: