1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Renault Fifties
To start off, 1996 Renault Fifties is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,099 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Fifties is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Fifties (60 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Fifties should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Fifties weights approximately 815 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 40 | 1996 Renault Fifties | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 40 | Fifties |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1099 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 60 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |
