1967 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Daewoo Korando
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Korando is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Korando (108 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Korando weights approximately 328 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Daewoo Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Daewoo Korando (421 Nm) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 1999 Daewoo Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 1999 Daewoo Korando | |
Make | Austin | Daewoo |
Model | A 40 | Korando |
Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 421 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1088 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 48 L |