1967 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2005 Mazda AZ is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,096 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda AZ (63 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda AZ should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40.
Because 2005 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda AZ (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda AZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 2005 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 40 | AZ |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2260 mm |