1967 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 753 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | A 40 | Sable |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |