1967 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Nissan Versa

To start off, 2010 Nissan Versa is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Versa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Versa (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Versa should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Versa weights approximately 306 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Versa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Versa (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Versa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: