1967 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2011 Nissan Titan is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40.
Because 2011 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 2011 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Titan |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 4060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 140 L |