1967 Austin A 40 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 625 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40.
Because 1967 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 40 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Austin | Mini |
Model | A 40 | Countryman |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 47 L |