1967 Austin A 60 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1967 Austin A 60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 90 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 60 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 60 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 75 L |
