1967 Austin A 60 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1967 Austin A 60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 60 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |
