1967 Austin A 60 vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 1967 Austin A 60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin A 60 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 60 | 1964 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 60 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 43 HP |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 31 L |
