1967 Austin A 60 vs. 1966 Fiat OT
To start off, 1967 Austin A 60 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat OT (75 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat OT should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin A 60 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1966 Fiat OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Fiat OT (134 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1966 Fiat OT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 1966 Fiat OT | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 60 | OT |
Year Released | 1967 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1280 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 134 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 37 L |