1967 Austin A 60 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin A 60 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 60 | 102 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2160 mm |