1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Ford 24.7

To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford 24.7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford 24.7 (128 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford 24.7 weights approximately 88 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications: