1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Honda Integra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Integra (143 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda Integra weights approximately 79 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 60 | 2000 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Austin | Honda |
| Model | A 60 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4525 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1325 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
