1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2001 BMW Z9
To start off, 2001 BMW Z9 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z9 (286 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z9 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 475 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2001 BMW Z9 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 60 | Z9 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 286 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 597 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 63 L |