1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2002 Eagle Vision is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Eagle Vision (197 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Vision weights approximately 450 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2002 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Austin | Eagle |
Model | A 60 | Vision |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |