1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram

To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 950 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Austin A 60 2003 Dodge Ram
Make Austin Dodge
Model A 60 Ram
Year Released 1967 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1622 cc 3906 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 60 HP 173 HP
Torque 122 Nm 305 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 2070 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 2030 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2790 mm