1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 386 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 60 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 60 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 62 L |
