1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 375 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1495 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 82 L |