1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 865 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 395 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 82 L |