1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1285 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Livina (154 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Livina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Livina |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 52 L |