1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | HHR |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 61 L |