1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2010 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion (69 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60.
Because 2010 Daihatsu Sirion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2010 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
Model | A 60 | Sirion |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 69 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |