1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Citroen C3
To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C3 (108 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C3 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C3 (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2011 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | A 60 | C3 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1408 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |