1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Bravo (119 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 230 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin A 60 | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | A 60 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 58 L |
